Last week, although it somehow feels like it was an age ago, I know I posted a longish "thingy" about Palin. And I continued to think about the topic and how I was feeling about it, and some of you had interesting things to say in response. And so, it seems that a further exploration of the general topic seems to be in order.
So C. pointed out, and I think that she's right, that there's this weird, uncomfortable, and ultimately mislead double standard. It's like some people think Hilary C. is not to be admired because she's been ambitious and has been open about it. In contrast, Palin is presented as this "Hockey Mom" who has really been a stay-at-home mother at heart but has somehow fallen into this whole vice presidency thing (I almost said "farce"), and that we're supposed to find Palin inspiring and acceptable because she's been committed to her family before her career, because she hasn't shown the ambition that Hilary has. And, really why is it acceptable, at least according to some segments in society, for the Hockey Mom to run for office and somehow offensive when the ambitious mom does? Don't get me wrong--I don't see it this way. And I don't want to suggest that I think Hilary has been anything other than a good mother--I certainly don't know anything about her as a mother other than to say that Chelsea seems to have turned out well. But what really gets to me is this: Palin must have been and must be ambitious and hard working. OK, so I don't think she's particularly qualified for second in command, but she has been a mayor and even a governor, albeit for a short amount of time. But one doesn't get to be a governor, even of Alaska, without hard work and ambition. She's been personally ambitious; she's worked to advance her career. I think this is fine. But it bothers me when some want to act like she's admirable because she's been somehow non-ambitious, somehow antithetical to Hilary in this regard.
Secondly, as I am prone to do, I turned my analysis of Palin really into an analysis of women's position in society and an analysis of myself and my own position in a variety of social structures. Hey, we all know the personal IS the political, right? Or is it the political that's personal? I forget which it is. But I went on and on about not having children, not having a "partner." And I do love that we can use the term "partner." Anyhow, when I said that I feel somehow "broken" because I don't have a partner, I really meant that I feel like there must be something wrong with me or I wouldn't be alone. I mean, I know this is not rational, but too often it simply feels like no one wants me. And the reasoning goes like this: "No one wants me. This must mean that I am undesirable. There must be something wrong with me, or someone would want me. I must be broken beyond repair." Again, I am saying clearly, this sort of thinking is not realistic or reasonable. But still, it feels like no one wants me, therefore I must be un-want-able. And to be fair, I think I've had more than my fair share of dramatic (shall we say melodramatic?), extreme, heart-breaking rejections from men I've really, truly loved. I seriously think I may have PTSD from the whole Stamp thing. But it always feels like if I'd been somehow better, maybe he would have wanted me, maybe he'd want me now. I think that most people would have some insecurities in the wake of some of this, right? (So I'm sparing you all a long, melodramatic narrative of how it went down with Stamp; I'm assuming that if you know me well at all, you know the situation. And the truth is (I hate admiting this) that all this time later, I sill miss him and think about him and wish that things could have somehow been different. Please don't e-mail me to say that's silly. I know it's silly, but it's just part of it.) Anyhow, that's really only tangentially (or maybe not at all) related to the Palin question. But the topic is, clearly, bringing up all kinds of difficult "stuff" for me.
P.S. In future posts, I'll try to cut down on the parentheticals. Bad writing style!
a president, a King
13 years ago
















