I don't know where to start. Like many of us, I have had Sarah Palin on the brain for the last ten days ago. And I've officially decided, much to the consternation of some, I know, that I'm not going to vote in Novemeber. I've also officially decided to not engage in conversations and certainly not snide comments about the candidates, the parties, or the process. One reason I've decided not to vote is that, really, with the electoral college working as it does, I sorta feel like my vote doesn't count. I mean, Vermont is certainly going to the Democrats, regardless of how I do or don't vote. I don't think that's cynical of me; I think it's realistic.
But here's what I really think about Sarah Palin. (Ok, I know that I just decided not to engage in conversations about the candidates, but I consider my personal rant far from a conversation). Regardless of ideology and politics and all that stuff, which I do consider to be really important, I don't think that Palin is qualified. I don't think that she has the requisite experience that I'd like to see in someone who could potentially be the leader of the free world. Just for the record, I think the same about Obama. I do realize that for both of them, part of the attraction is the perception that they are not entrenched in the establishment. I guess that I understand that as a kind of selling point, but in Palin's case, I'm not buying.
I do feel that, at least for me, one positive that's come about as a direct resuly of Palin's being chosen as McCain's running mate is that many of us are revisiting some pretty big questions about women with careers and especially working mothers. This topic is one that I find myself coming back to over and over. I know that I've said before that I always feel like I've somehow been betrayed by feminism, as a movement (yes, I know that I'm talking about white, privileged feminism here). I feel like feminism (or maybe 2nd wave feminism) has told us that in order to be happy and successful we need to have rewarding careers and fabulous marriages while we are super moms too. I, for one, don't think that I have it in me to do all three of these at once. In fact, at 33, I have accepted that I'll probably never have a child. And I'm totally OK with not having children. In fact, I don't see how I could work the way that I want to and still have it in me to be a good mother. I know that many women do it and that many of them do it gracefully. I am not one of those women, and I'm sure it has more to do with my own emotional weaknesses than anything else. For a long while, I felt like I was supposed to at least want children, like there was something defective about me if I didn't. Now I realize that, at least for me, it's a choice: career OR children. Or maybe I could, in theory, have both, but I can't imagine doing a very good job of either. And over the last week, Mika Brzezinski, who I really like as far as newsy personalities go, has been talking about this topic in her own way. And I appreciate what she has to say about Palin and being a working mother. And Mika (don't you love how suddenly I'm all palsy with her?) says that for herself working the way she does is a choice and that it does take time and energy away from her children. I know she doesn't buy into Palin's politics, but Brzezinski says she can identify with the sacrifices that working mothers make. But the thing is that Brzezinski and Palin and even I have a choice. Many women, especially single mothers, don't have a choice. And really, aren't the mothers working 50 and 60 hours a week at blue collar jobs to house and feed their children, aren't they the real heroes? And aren't they the ones we should be concerned about? I mean, all these pundits going on and on about Palin and if she gets the big job, who will take care of her children. Palin has a choice to make--talk about ProChoice--too many mothers, especially single mothers, don't have the luxury of choice. And we don't talk about this often enough, it seems to me. (Ok, here's where I get all "meta:" I realize this paragraph lacks a single focus. And I'm OK with that--I'm just sorto of thinking out loud on paper, or on screen. Well, you know what I mean.)
And I haven't even begun to address how marriage and relationships might fit into the mix. I believe that, in general, being a single parent is much more demanding and much more difficult than having a partner with whom to raise children. At 33, I have begun to accept that I may never, never get married and have that kind of partnership in my life. This, for me, is much more difficult to accept than the prospect of not having children. But it's a possibility (a probability????) that I think I need to face. And I have to say that not being married, or more specifically feeling like I have more than my share of spectacularly failed relationships in my past makes me feel like a failure. I can be OK with never being a mother, but the idea of never having a fulfilling, intimate relationship makes me feel so broken somehow. And I do feel a lot of societal pressure--it's like there must be something wrong with me if I can't do something so normal as sustain a relationship. I know that my perceptions and reality aren't the same thing here; this is just how I feel much of the time.
I guess that what I'm trying to say is this: thinking about Palin has, for me, brought up questions about how I, as a woman and as a feminist and as a product of a particular historical and cultural moment and as a product of a particular set of religious beliefs, define success. Too often, I find that the definitions of a successful woman offered by the various societal groups with which I identify are definitions of success that just don't work for me. And I'm not sure where that leaves me. Right now, it leaves me with a job that I enjoy and that I really believe in. But sometimes, I feel like that's about all I'm left with, and I don't know what to think or feel about that.
Oh, and one more thing: I cannot make myself believe that reproductive rights are the central issue for women in the way that some others seem to think they are. Maybe I'll post more on this later, or maybe I'll continue to avoid the issue.
a president, a King
13 years ago





